
Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies››2015,Vol. 15››Issue (07): 8-11.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.07.003
• Articles •Previous ArticlesNext Articles
HAN Caiying, WU Na
Online:2015-07-28Published:2020-07-25CLC Number:
HAN Caiying, WU Na. Current State of Contextual Theory Research and the Linguistic Significance of the Subject of Context[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 8-11.
| Fishman, J. A. 1968.Readings in the Sociology of Language[C]. The Hague: Mouton. Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1985.Language, Context and Text[M]. Victoria: Deakin University Press. Hymes, D. H. 1964.Language in Culture and Society[C]. New York: Harper & Row. Levinson, S. C. 1983.Pragmatics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Malinowski, B. 1923. The problems of meaning in primitive language [A]. In C. K. Ogden & A. Richards (eds.).The Meaning of Meaning[C]. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. 296-336. 陈望道.1997.修辞学发凡[M].上海:上海教育出版社. 戴维·克里斯特尔.1995.剑桥语言百科全书(方晶等译)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社. 冯广艺.1999.语境适应论[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社. 桂诗春、宁春岩.1997.语言学方法论[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社. 郭贵春.1997.论语境[J].哲学研究(4):46-51. 韩彩英.2000.语境的制约功能及其表现形式[J].语言文字应用(4):37-42. 韩彩英、李悦娥.2002.语境的外延衍生与内涵衍化[J].外语与外语教学(11):16-18. 韩彩英.2004a.语境本质论[J].自然辩证法通讯(5):43-47. 韩彩英2004b.关于语境问题的哲学解读[J].科学技术与辩证法(3):65-69. 韩彩英.2005.认识活动实在性的语言符号表征[J].科学技术与辩证法(2):39-41. 韩彩英.2006.文化实在:认识活动在语境中的语言-符号实在性[J].科学技术与辩证法(5):50-53. 韩彩英.2008.文化关系和文化过程:认识活动在语境中的语言符号确定性[J].科学技术与辩证法(1):44-49. 杰弗里·N·利奇.1998.语义学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社. 李悦娥、韩彩英.2002.略论语境对情景会话语篇语义关联性的制约[J].外语与外语教学(5):12-16. 王占馥.2000.境况语义学[M].福州:福建人民出版社. 殷杰、韩彩英.2005.视域与路径:语境结构研究方法论[J].科学技术与辩证法(5):38-44. |
| [1] | Shenghuan XU, Qian LIU.The application ofCausal Implication Theory: Study of conversational implicature taken as an example[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 5-20. |
| [2] | Chaojun YANG, Gengqian YANG.The Syntactic Mechanism of the Indirect Meaning of the WXDY Construction[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 71-83. |
| [3] | LIU Longgen, ZHU Xiaozhen, HUO Wenjing.An Empirical Study on Chinese Advanced EFL Learners' Semantic Intuition about the Relationship of Literal Meaning with “What-Is-Said”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(05): 50-62. |
| [4] | XUE Xiaojiao, WANG Xiaonan, ZHOU Weijing.A Study on the Intelligibility of Chinese Learners' Productions of English /l/-/r/[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(02): 44-56. |
| [5] | YANG Yaping.The Revival of Ordinary Language Philosophy[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(01): 97-105. |
| [6] | ZHAO Lizhu.A Contrastive Study of Evaluation Chunks in Chinese and Native Scholars' Academic Texts[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2018, 18(01): 31-35. |
| [7] | QI Xi.To Argue and Persuade—the Debatable Standing inNew York TimesEditorials[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(03): 24-28. |
| [8] | XIAO Ruolin, WEI Naixing.A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of N that-cl Patterns in Research Articles by Chinese and Western Scholars[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(01): 34-41. |
| [9] | FAN Zhenqiang.The Contextual Effects and Motivation of Tautology within Neo-cognitive Pragmatics[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 12-16. |
| [10] | LI Dongmei.The Study of Language-related Genes FOXP2[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 47-51. |
| [11] | WEN Xu.Political Discourse and Political Metaphors[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 11-16. |
| [12] | HE Mengyi.Ideology in Political Metaphor[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 17-23. |
| [13] | WU Shuqiong, ZHANG Shaoquan.On the Cross-linguistic Study of Grammatical Metonymy[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 24-29. |
| [14] | HUANG Shuguang.The Conceptual Prominence in Metonymy Operation[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 30-35. |
| [15] | WANG Ronghua.The “Two Eyes” of Metaphor: Integration and Complement of Conceptual Metaphor and Grammatical Metaphor[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 36-41. |
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |
|
|||||
| Abstract |
|
|||||