
Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies››2014,Vol. 14››Issue (09): 17-23.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.09.003
• Articles •Previous ArticlesNext Articles
HE Mengyi
Online:2014-09-28Published:2020-07-25CLC Number:
HE Mengyi. Ideology in Political Metaphor[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 17-23.
| Fairclough, N. 2003.Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research[M]. London: Routledge. Gerard, S. 2002. Identifying metaphor in language: A cognitive approach [J].Style36(3): 386-407. Johnson, M. 2008. Philosophy's debt to metaphor [A]. In R. Gibbs (ed.).The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 39-52. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980.Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Minsky, M. A. 1974. Framework for representing knowledge [J].MIT-AI Laboratory Memo306(6): 1-106. Oliveira, R. P. 2001. Language and ideology—An interview with George Lakoff [A]. In D. Hawkins & E. Sandikioglu (eds.).Language and Ideology[C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Thompson, S. 1996. Politics without metaphor is like a fish without water [A]. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (eds.).Metaphor: Implications and Applications[C]. Mahwah: Erlbaum. Ungerer, F. & H. J. Schmid. 2009.An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. van Dijk, T. A. 2008.Discourse and Power[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 大卫·麦克里兰.2005.意识形态(孔兆政、蒋龙翔译)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社. 汉斯·摩根索.1996.国家间政治——权力斗争与和平(徐昕等译)[M].北京:北京大学出版社. 贺梦依.2011.概念隐喻与政治的关系识解[J].外国语文(3):48-52. 贾凤兰、林巧燕.2010.“巧实力”[J].求是(13):64. 潘亚玲.2010.冷战后美国对华战略转变的根本逻辑和手段——兼论奥巴马政府的对华政策[J].当代亚太(3):6-21. 束定芳.2000.隐喻学研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社. 夏尔·阿列克西·德·托克维尔.1991.论美国的民主(董果良译)[M].北京:商务印书馆. 周敏.2006.克林顿、布什对华政策的共同点分析[J].国际问题研究(9):208-209. 周琪.2006.意识形态与美国外交[M].上海:上海人民出版社. 朱永生.2005.框架理论对语境动态研究的启示[J].外语与外语教学(2):1-4. |
| [1] | Shenghuan XU, Qian LIU.The application ofCausal Implication Theory: Study of conversational implicature taken as an example[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 5-20. |
| [2] | Chaojun YANG, Gengqian YANG.The Syntactic Mechanism of the Indirect Meaning of the WXDY Construction[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 71-83. |
| [3] | LIU Longgen, ZHU Xiaozhen, HUO Wenjing.An Empirical Study on Chinese Advanced EFL Learners' Semantic Intuition about the Relationship of Literal Meaning with “What-Is-Said”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(05): 50-62. |
| [4] | XUE Xiaojiao, WANG Xiaonan, ZHOU Weijing.A Study on the Intelligibility of Chinese Learners' Productions of English /l/-/r/[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(02): 44-56. |
| [5] | YANG Yaping.The Revival of Ordinary Language Philosophy[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(01): 97-105. |
| [6] | QI Xi.To Argue and Persuade—the Debatable Standing inNew York TimesEditorials[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(03): 24-28. |
| [7] | XIAO Ruolin, WEI Naixing.A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of N that-cl Patterns in Research Articles by Chinese and Western Scholars[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(01): 34-41. |
| [8] | LI Dongmei.The Study of Language-related Genes FOXP2[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 47-51. |
| [9] | WEN Xu.Political Discourse and Political Metaphors[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 11-16. |
| [10] | WU Shuqiong, ZHANG Shaoquan.On the Cross-linguistic Study of Grammatical Metonymy[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 24-29. |
| [11] | HUANG Shuguang.The Conceptual Prominence in Metonymy Operation[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 30-35. |
| [12] | WANG Ronghua.The “Two Eyes” of Metaphor: Integration and Complement of Conceptual Metaphor and Grammatical Metaphor[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 36-41. |
| [13] | XIE Nini.Review ofReading Visual Narratives[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 74-76. |
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |
|
|||||
| Abstract |
|
|||||