An Empirical Study on Chinese Advanced EFL Learners' Semantic Intuition about the Relationship of Literal Meaning with “What-Is-Said”

Abstract

CLC Number:

LIU Longgen, ZHU Xiaozhen, HUO Wenjing. An Empirical Study on Chinese Advanced EFL Learners' Semantic Intuition about the Relationship of Literal Meaning with “What-Is-Said”[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(05): 50-62.

References

Bach, K. 1994. Conversational impliciture [J]. Mind and Language (9): 124-162.
Baptista, L. 2014. Saying what? On Grice on what is said [J]. European Journal of Philosophy 22(1): 1-19.
Borg, E. 2012. Pursuing Meaning [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cappelen, H. & E. Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism [M]. Blackwell.
Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication [M]. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Coulson, S. & T. Oakley. 2005. Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantic [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10): 1510-1536.
Dascal, M. 1987. Defending literal meaning [J]. Cognitive Science 11: 258-281.
Doran, R., G. Ward, M. Larson & Y. McNabb. 2012. A novel experimental paradigm for distinguishing between what is said and what is implicated [J]. Language 88 (1):124-154.
Gibbs, R. & J. Moise. 1997. Pragmatics in understanding what is said [J]. Cognition 62: 51-74.
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words [M]. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2012. Semantics/pragmatics boundary disputes [A].In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner(eds.). Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Vol. 3 [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 2333-2360.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2016. Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics, Philosophy of Language [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lepore, E. & M. Stone. 2015. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Récanati, F. 2004. Literal Meaning [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Récanati, F. 2017. Contextualism and polysemy[J].Dialectica71(3):379-397.
Searle, J. 1978. Literal meaning [J].Erkenntnis 13:207-224.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 2012. Meaning and Relevance [M]. London: Cambridge University Press.
Sternau, M., M. Ariel, R. Giora & O. Fein. 2015. Levels of interpretation: New tools for characterizing intended meanings [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 84: 86-101.
Thau, M. 2002. Consciousness and Cognition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[1]	.[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 5-20.
[2]	.[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 71-83.
[3]	XUE Xiaojiao, WANG Xiaonan, ZHOU Weijing.A Study on the Intelligibility of Chinese Learners' Productions of English /l/-/r/[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(02): 44-56.
[4]	YANG Yaping.The Revival of Ordinary Language Philosophy[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(01): 97-105.
[5]	XIAO Ruolin, WEI Naixing.A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of N that-cl Patterns in Research Articles by Chinese and Western Scholars[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(01): 34-41.