第二次启蒙视域下的有机语言学与体认语言学

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于第二次启蒙的相关思想,本文提出了有机语言学的新构想。有机语言学依托有机世界观,主张用动态的、有机整体的视角看语言,将语言视为关系性的存在、生成性的存在。从这个意义上讲,有机语言学也是一种生态语言学,具有极其重要的生态维度,是一种为生态文明服务的语言学,是克服人类中心主义的有效武器。中国学者王寅提出的“体认语言学”可以看作有机语言学在中国的发展形态。“体认语言学”的理论创新不仅体现为对体验的强调和对语言重要性的强调,而且体现为对有机整合思维的强调。对于克服汉语界与外语界“不相往来的尴尬局面”和发展一种既整合中西语言优势又具有中国特色的生态文明语言学,有机语言学和体认语言学可以做出独特的贡献。

关键词:实体语言学,过程哲学,第二次启蒙,有机语言学,体认语言学,生态语言学

Abstract:

This paper proposes a new concept of organic linguistics from the perspective of the Second Enlightenment. Based on an organic world view, organic linguistics stresses that language should be understood as a dynamic and organic whole. Organic linguistics views language as a relational being. In this sense, organic linguistics can also be regarded as an ecological linguistics. Moreover, the ecological implications of language can play role in overcoming anthropocentrism and serving ecological civilization. This paper goes on to argue that the embodied-cognitive linguistics proposed by Chinese Professor Yin Wang is not only a new development in linguistics, but also a form of organic linguistics. The theoretical innovation of embodied-cognitive linguistics reflects not only an emphasis on the relationship between experience and language, but also an emphasis an organic holistic thinking. This kind of organic linguistics can make a special contribution to the fields of Chinese language theory and foreign language theory in China by overcoming the current (and embarrassing) isolation between these two fields, thereby developing a theory of linguistics with Chinese characteristics for ecological civilization that integrates the strengths of both Chinese and Western language theory.

Key words:Substance Linguistics,Process Philosophy,Second Enlightenment,Organic Linguistics,Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics,Eco-Linguistics

中图分类号:

王治河, 张学涛, 张桂丹. 第二次启蒙视域下的有机语言学与体认语言学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(2): 93-104.

WANG Zhihe, ZHANG Xuetao, ZHANG Guidan. Organic Linguistics and Embodied-Cognitive Linguistics from the Perspective of the Second Enlightenment[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(2): 93-104.

参考文献46

[1]	Barad K. 2007.Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning[M]. Durham: Duke University Press.
[2]	Cobb J. B. 2007. Person-in-community: Whiteheadian insights into community and institution[J].Organization Studies28(4):567-588. doi:10.1177/0170840607075268 URL
[3]	Deleuze G. & F. Guattari. 1987.A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (trans. by B. Massumi)[M]. Twin City: University of Minnesota Press.
[4]	Geeraerts D. 2016. The Sociosemiotic Commitment[J].Cognitive Linguistics27(4):527-542. doi:10.1515/cog-2016-0058 URL
[5]	Gentner D. & J. Loewenstein. 2002. Relational language and relational thought [A]. In E.Amsel & J. P. Byrnes (eds.).Language,Literacy,and Cognitive Development:The Development and Consequences of Symbolic Communication[C]. London: Psychology Press.87-120.
[6]	Goatly A. 1996. Green grammar and grammatical metaphor, or language and the myth of power, or metaphors we die by[J].Journal of Pragmatics25(4):537-560. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(95)00057-7 URL
[7]	Griffin D. 1996. The reenchantment of science [A]. In L. Cahoone(ed.)From Modernism to Postmodernism[C]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.665-686
[8]	Hall D. 1996. Modern China and the postmodern West [A]. In L. Cahoone (ed.).From Modernism to Postmodernism[C]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.705-708.
[9]	Halliday M.A.K. 1993. The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese [A]. In M.A.K. Halliday & J.R. Martin (eds.).Writing Science:Literacy and Discursive Power[C]. London: The Falmer Press. 124-132.
[10]	Hartshorne C. 1985.Creativity in American Philosophy[M]. Albany: SUNY Press.
[11]	Heidegger M. 1996. Letter on humanism [A]. In L. Cahoone(ed.).From Modernism to Postmodernism[M]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.274-308
[12]	Holt D. L. 1982. Metaphorsas imaginative propositions[J].Process Studies12(4):252-256. doi:10.5840/process19821244 URL
[13]	Jacobson N. P. 1988.The Heart of Buddhist Philosophy[M]. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
[14]	Kopytin A.I. 2020. Toward an ecological civilization—an interview with Arran Gare[J].Ecopoiesis:Eco-Human Theory and Practice(1) :1-10.
[15]	Langacker R. W. 2016. Working toward a synjournal[J].Cognitive Linguistics27(4):465-477. doi:10.1515/cog-2016-0004 URL
[16]	Link P. 2013.An Anatomy of Chinese: Rhythm, Metaphor, Politics[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[17]	Link P. 2016. The mind: less puzzling in Chinese? [J/OL].NY Review of Books(6).[2022-02-12].https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/06/30/the-mind-less-puzzling-in-chinese/.
[18]	Mazzei L. 2017. Following the contour of concepts toward a minor inquiry[J].Qualitative Inquiry23(9):675-685. doi:10.1177/1077800417725356 URL
[19]	Pennycook A. 2010.Language as a Local Practice[M]. London: Routledge.
[20]	Pound E. 1920.Instigations of Ezra Pound: Together with an Essay on The Chinese Written Character by Ernest Fenollosa[M]. Montana: Kessinger Publishing, LLC.
[21]	Smyre, A. & N. Richardson. 2016.Preparing for a World that doesn’t Exist yet:Framing a Second Enlightenment to Create Communities of the Future[M]. Hampshire: Changemakers Books.
[22]	Stibbe A. 2015.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live by[M]. London: Routledge.
[23]	Toohey K. 2019. The onto-epistemologies of new materialism: implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research[J].Applied Linguistics40(6):937-956. doi:10.1093/applin/amy046 URL
[24]	Walsh, Z. J. Böhme & C. Wamsler. 2020. Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education[J].Ambio50(1):74-84. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01322-y URL
[25]	Watts A. W. 1957.The Way of Zen[M]. New York: Random House.
[26]	Whitehead A. 1978.Process and Reality[M]. New York: The Free Press.
[27]	Whorf B. L. 1940. Science and linguistics[J].MIT Technology Review42(6): 229-231, 247-248.
[28]	海德格尔. 1996. 海德格尔选集(孙周兴选编)[M]. 上海: 生活·读书·新知上海三联书店.
[29]	何伟、安德鲁·格特力. 2020. 生态语言学的学科属性及其分支生态文体学——安德鲁·格特力教授访谈录[J]. 北京科技大学学报 36(1):7.
[30]	杰伊·麦克丹尼尔. 2004. 生态学与文化:一种过程哲学的视域(曲跃厚译)[J]. 求是学刊 31(4):6.
[31]	林克勤. 2020. 语言力:中国媒体走出去的一种巧实力[J]. 学术界(4):118-126.
[32]	沈家煊. 2015. 立足语言多样性研究汉语[N]. 人民日报(08-19):7.
[33]	孙周兴. 2020. 当代哲学的处境与任务[J]. 探索与争鸣(6):33-42.
[34]	唐代兴. 2016. 阻止环境悬崖的社会转型策略[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)(4):198-206.
[35]	王力. 1984. 王力文集(第一卷:中国语法理论)[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社.
[36]	王晓华. 2021. 过程哲学的身体维度与生态图式[A]. 杨丽、温恒福、王治河. 中国过程研究(第六辑)[C]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社:204-215.
[37]	王寅. 2014. 后现代哲学视野下的体认语言学[J]. 外国语文(6):61-67.
[38]	王寅. 2017. 第二次启蒙与绿色教育——反思外语教育中的碎片化现象[J]. 温州大学学报(社会科学版)(3):48-55.
[39]	王寅. 2019. 体认语言学发凡[J]. 中国外语(6):18-25.
[40]	王寅. 2020. 体认社会语言学刍议[J]. 天津外国语大学学报(1):15-25.
[41]	王寅. 2020. 体认语言学—认知语言学的本土化研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.
[42]	王治河、樊美筠. 2017. 第二次启蒙对语哲研究及外语教学的启迪[J]. 外国语文 33(1):146-153.
[43]	王治河、蔚蓝、樊美筠. 2019. 从机械语言学到有机语言学[J]. 天津外国语大学学报(3):16-28.
[44]	许嘉璐. 2009. 卸下镣铐跳舞—中国哲学需要一场革命[J]. 文史哲(5):5-12.
[45]	张伯江. 2019. 吕叔湘:语言研究中的破与立[N]. 光明日报(06-10):11.
[46]	赵永峰. 2019. 身体·体验·认知:语言主体间性建构研究——以英语人称代词为例[J]. 外国语文 35(5):8-14.