Lift Distribution Based Design of Two-Dimensional Sections

Abstract

Abstract:A lift distribution based section design method has been proposed. Through Newton-Raphson iterations, the section geometry is efficiently designed to meet the requirements for total lift and lift distribution. The effect of fluid viscosity on total lift is taken into account by coupling Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation with the potential-flow based design procedure. The present method avoids the difficulty of assigning velocity or pressure distributions on section surfaces. As the loading and thickness distributions are expressed in parametric forms, it is easy to ensure that the designed geometry is continuous and smooth. The effects of lift and thickness distributions on cavitation bucket are numerically investigated. A shift of lift loading towards the aft part of section tends to decrease the margin of back cavitation, while the width of cavitation bucket can be kept almost unchanged. To have a wider cavitation bucket, one can increase the leading edge radius, move properly the location of maximum thickness towards the leading edge, or decrease the curvature at the location of maximum thickness.

Key words:section design| lift distribution| cavitation bucket| fluid viscosity

摘要：A lift distribution based section design method has been proposed. Through Newton-Raphson iterations, the section geometry is efficiently designed to meet the requirements for total lift and lift distribution. The effect of fluid viscosity on total lift is taken into account by coupling Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation with the potential-flow based design procedure. The present method avoids the difficulty of assigning velocity or pressure distributions on section surfaces. As the loading and thickness distributions are expressed in parametric forms, it is easy to ensure that the designed geometry is continuous and smooth. The effects of lift and thickness distributions on cavitation bucket are numerically investigated. A shift of lift loading towards the aft part of section tends to decrease the margin of back cavitation, while the width of cavitation bucket can be kept almost unchanged. To have a wider cavitation bucket, one can increase the leading edge radius, move properly the location of maximum thickness towards the leading edge, or decrease the curvature at the location of maximum thickness.

关键词:section design| lift distribution| cavitation bucket| fluid viscosity

CLC Number:

U 661.1

RAO Zhiqiang (饶志强), YANG Chenjun* (杨晨俊). Lift Distribution Based Design of Two-Dimensional Sections[J]. Journal of shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2017, 22(3): 265-273.

References17

[1]	LIGHTHILL M J. A new method of two-dimensionalaerodynamic design [R]. London: Aeronautical ResearchCouncil, 1945.
[2]	EPPLER R, SOMERS D M. A computer program forthe design and analysis of low-speed airfoils [R]. Hampton,Virginia: NASA Langley Research Center, 1980.
[3]	SELIG M S, MAUGHMER M D. Multipoint inverseairfoil design method based on conformal mapping [J].AIAA Journal, 1992, 30(5): 1162-1170.
[4]	ZENG Z B. A comparative investigation on optimizationof propeller blade section design [J]. Journal ofShip Mechanics, 2011, 15(12): 1344-1352.
[5]	DRELA M, GILES M B. Viscous-inviscid analysis oftransonic and low Reynolds number airfoils [J]. AIAAJournal, 1987, 25(10): 1347-1355.
[6]	DRELA M. XFOIL: An analysis and design system forlow Reynolds number airfoils [C]//Conference on LowReynolds Number Aerodynamics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989: 1-12.
[7]	SU Y M, CHEN Y X. Numerical design of the threedimensionalwing with a given pressure distributionform [J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2003, 21(1): 1-6 (inChinese).
[8]	SU Y M, IKEHATA M, KAI H. A numerical methodfor designing three-dimensional wing based on surfacepanel method [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architectsof Japan, 1997, 182: 39-47.
[9]	HICKS R M, HENNE P A. Wing design by numericaloptimization [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(7): 407-412.
[10]	GUAN X H, SONG B F, LI Z K. Comparative studyof two supersonic wing-bogy wave drag optimizationmethods [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronatica Sinica,2013, 34(11): 2510-2519 (in Chinese).
[11]	KULFAN B M, BUSSOLETTI J E. “Fundamental”parametric geometry representations for aircraftcomponent shapes [C]//11th AIAA/ISSMO MultidisciplinaryAnalysis and Optimization Conference.Portsmouth, Virginia: AIAA, 2006: AIAA-2006-6948.
[12]	ROBINSON G M, KEANE A J. Concise orthogonalrepresentation of supercritical airfoils [J]. Journal ofAircraft, 2001, 38(3): 580-583.
[13]	MA X Y, FAN Z L, WU W H, et al. Aerodynamicshape optimization for wing based on NURBS [J]. ActaAeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(9): 1616-1621 (in Chinese).
[14]	SOBIECZKY H. Parametric airfoils and wings [J].Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 68: 71-88.
[15]	ZHANG D H, GAO Z H, HUANG L K, et al. Doublestagemetamodel and its application in aerodynamicdesign optimization [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2011, 24(5): 568-576.
[16]	KUDO T, UKON Y. Computation on a twodimensionalsupercavitating hydrofoil using the linearvortex panel method [J]. Transactions of the West-Japan Society of Naval Architects, 1993, 86: 37-46 (inJapanese).
[17]	ABBOTT I H, VON DOENHOFF A E. Theory of wingsection: Including a summary of airfoil data [M]. NewYork: Dover Publications Inc, 1959.