Effect evaluation of intelligent classroom application in blended teaching of rheumatic diseases

Abstract

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of intelligent classroom in blended teaching of rheumatic diseases in Army Medical University.MethodsThe research subjects were clinical students at our school in 2021 and 2022, in which the traditional teaching method of rheumatic diseases were applied to the students in 2021, and the blended teaching method was used for students in 2022. The effects of two teaching methods were retrospectively analyzed by comparing their final grades. At the same time, a questionnaire was used to evaluate 2022 students’ acceptance of the blended teaching method.ResultsThe questionnaire shows that more than 80% of students are willing to accept intelligent classroom teaching, and the blended teaching based on intelligent classroom can significantly improve students’ final grades.ConclusionsBlended teaching based on intelligent classroom can significantly improve the teaching quality of rheumatic diseases, help students understand rheumatic diseases better, improve students’ autonomous learning and lifelong learning ability.

Key words:Intelligent classroom,Blended teaching,Traditional teaching,Teaching efficiency

CLC Number:

R593.2

CHEN Yan, XIAO Fei, DAI Huanzi. Effect evaluation of intelligent classroom application in blended teaching of rheumatic diseases[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice, 2024, 19(06): 405-408.

Figures/Tables3

Table 1

Questionnaire results(n)

调查内容	非常有帮助	有一些帮助	没有帮助
智慧课堂对课前预习的效果	56	101	17
智慧课堂对上课时理解内容的效果	59	101	14
智慧课堂对课后复习的效果	60	89	25
智慧课堂对帮助掌握知识	55	109	10
智慧课堂对增强学习兴趣	50	87	37
智慧课堂对加强自主学习能力	58	87	29
智慧课堂对提高分析和解决问题能力	43	107	24
智慧课堂对督促学习	56	109	9
智慧课堂混合式学习方式满足个性化学习需求	68	99	7
智慧课堂让你学习更主动	52	112	10
智慧课堂使您能够有效地管理您的学习时间	53	108	13
智慧课堂提供了合适的电子学习资源	73	96	5
智慧课堂的学习，您的收获如何	54	104	16
你愿意将智慧课堂模式推荐给其他老师或同学吗	64	88	22

Table 1

班级	最高分	最低分	中位数	平均分	标准差	t	P
2021年(n=101)	85.5	52.0	72.0	71.2	7.3	-4.558 7	<0.01
2022年(n=183)	90.0	54.5	75.5	75.1	6.5

Table 2

Figure 1

References17

[1]	Wu C, Chen L, Han M, et al. Application of ChatGPT-based blended medical teaching in clinical education of hepatobiliary surgery[J].Med Teach.[Epub ahead of print].
[2]	Zhang A, Feng X. The concept analysis of smart teaching[J].Nurse Educ Today,2022,112:105329.
[3]	O’Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, et al. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review[J].BMC Med Educ,2018,18(1):130. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0pmid:29880045
[4]	Voutilainen A, Saaranen T, Sormunen M. Conventionalvs.e-learning in nursing education: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Nurse Educ Today,2017,50:97-103.
[5]	Almpanis T, Joseph-Richard P. Lecturing from home: exploring academics’ experiences of remote teaching during a pandemic[J].Int J Educ Res Open,2022,3:100133.
[6]	Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, et al. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Med Internet Res,2020,22(8):e16504.
[7]	Chan T, Sebok-Syer S, Thoma B, et al. Learning analytics in medical education assessment: the past, the present, and the future[J].AEM Educ Train,2018,2(2):178-187. doi:10.1002/aet2.10087pmid:30051086
[8]	Coyne E, Rands H, Frommolt V, et al. Investigation of blended learning video resources to teach health students clinical skills: an integrative review[J].Nurse Educ Today,2018,63:101-107.
[9]	Lozano-Lozano M, Fernández-Lao C, Cantarero-Villanueva I, et al. A blended learning system to improve motivation, mood state, and satisfaction in undergraduate students: randomized controlled trial[J].J Med Internet Res,2020,22(5):e17101.
[10]	Wu C, Chen L, Han M, et al. Application of ChatGPT-based blended medical teaching in clinical education of hepatobiliary surgery[J].Med Teach,2024,13:1-5.
[11]	Li S, Su L, Lou R, et al. Blended teaching mode based on small private online course and case-based learning in analgesia and sedation education in China: a comparison with an offline mode[J].BMC Med Educ,2024,24(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04839-4pmid:38178081
[12]	Fu XT, Hu Y, Yan BC, et al. The use of blended teaching in higher medical education during the pandemic era[J].Int J Clin Pract,2022,2022:3882975.
[13]	Lu SY, Ren XP, Xu H, et al. Improving self-directed learning ability of medical students using the blended teaching method: a quasi-experimental study[J].BMC Med Educ,2023,23(1):616. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04565-xpmid:37644528
[14]	Narayanan SN, Merghani TH. Real-life scenario blended teaching approach for nurturing inquisitive learning of central nervous system in medical students[J].Adv Physiol Educ,2023,47(1):124-138. doi:10.1152/advan.00054.2022pmid:36602993
[15]	Gao J, Yang L, Zou J, et al. Comparison of the influence of massive open online courses and traditional teaching methods in medical education in China: a meta-analysis[J].Biochem Mol Biol Educ,2021,49(4):639-651.
[16]	Cao W, Hu L, Li X, et al. Massive Open Online Courses-based blended versus face-to-face classroom teaching methods for fundamental nursing course[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2021,100(9):e24829.
[17]	Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2014,111(23):8410-8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111pmid:24821756