Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice››2025,Vol. 24››Issue (03): 293-300.doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.03.008

• Original article •Previous ArticlesNext Articles

Application value of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in T staging and treatment decision-making for middle and low rectal cancer

ZHAO Rana, ZHAN Weiweia(), LI Chenga, TANG Hailanga, BO Yulianb, LIU Kunc

  1. a. Department of Ultrasound, b. Department of Radiology, c. Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201800, China
  • Received:2025-02-08Accepted:2025-05-05Online:2025-06-25Published:2025-06-25
  • Contact:ZHAN Weiwei E-mail:shanghairuijin@126.com

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo explore the application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in T staging of middle and low rectal cancer, providing an accurate basis for multidisciplinary treatment (MDT).MethodAA retrospective analysis was conducted on the case data of 80 consecutive patients with middle and low rectal cancer admitted to the hospital from April 2023 to February 2025. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), CEUS, and 3.0T MRI examinations within one week before biopsy or surgery. Using postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, the diagnostic performance of single and combined examinations in diagno-sing T staging of low rectal cancer was calculated separately.ResultThe combined examination for T1rectal cancer showed a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 99%, positive predictive value of 99.9%, and negative predictive value of 96.7%. For T2rectal cancer, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 91.3%, 96.3%, 91.3%, and 96.3%, respectively. For T3rectal cancer, these values were 93.5%, 97.8%, 96.7%, and 95.7%, respectively. For T4rectal cancer, these values were 90%, 98.5%, 90%, and 98.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined examination for T1-T4rectal cancer was 97.5%, 97.5%, 96.25%, and 98.7%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS examination alone for T1-T4stages was 87.5%, 86.96%, 80.65%, and 80%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI examination alone for T1-T4stages was 81.25%, 78.26%, 90.32%, and 90%, respectively. The accuracy of the combined examination was significantly higher than that of CEUS or MRI examination alone (P<0.05). The consistency between the combined examination and pathological staging was good (Kappa value=0.877,P<0.05). After CEUS combined with MRI examination, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the diagnostic model rose to 0.85, significantly exceeding that of single examination methods(CEUS AUC=0.75, MRI AUC=0.758). Additionally, it was found that T1-T2rectal cancer showed varying degrees of uniform enhancement on CEUS, and the specificity of CEUS combined with MRI in diagnosing T1-T2rectal cancer reached over 96.3%. The low enhancement observed on CEUS in the portal phase achieved a high specificity of 95.5% for diagnosing T3and higher-stage tumors.ConclusionCEUS combined with MRI has significant advantages in the diagnosis of T staging of rectal cancer, especially for T1and T2stages, which have notable superiority over single examination. The accuracy of the combined examination can reach 97.5% and 97.5%, and the specificity can reach 99% and 96.3%, respectively, making it useful for ruling out non-neoplastic lesions.

Key words:Multimodal imaging,Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound,Magnetic resonance imaging,Rectal cancer T staging,Surgical treatment

CLC Number:

Baidu
map