
诊断学理论与实践››2024,Vol. 23››Issue (01): 57-66.doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2024.01.008
收稿日期:2023-07-11出版日期:2024-02-25发布日期:2024-05-30通讯作者:肖立,E-mail:fangjx0207@foxmail.comZHU Xia, WANG Xin, JIN Jingjing, XIAO Li(
)
Received:2023-07-11Published:2024-02-25Online:2024-05-30摘要:
目的:研究病灶最大径≤1 cm肺腺癌患者EGFR、ALK及ROS1基因状态。方法:收集2013年1月至2020年10月经华东医院病理科确诊为肺腺癌且病灶最大径≤1 cm,并行表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)、间变性淋巴瘤激酶(anaplastic lymphoma kinase,ALK)和(或)原癌基因酪氨酸蛋白激酶ROS(ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase,ROS1)检测的患者的临床病理资料,回顾性分析其EGFR、ALK、ROS1基因状态及其临床病理学特点。结果:纳入1 232例病灶最大径≤1 cm肺腺癌患者,平均年龄54岁,男性387例,女性845例;多发病灶患者只选1个病灶。本组原位腺癌182例(14.8%),微浸润性腺癌778例(63.1%),浸润性非黏液性腺癌249例(20.2%),浸润性黏液腺癌23例(1.9%)。43.1%(352/817例)存在EGFR基因突变,其中46.9%(165/352例)为21L858R突变,40.6%(143/352例)为19Del突变,0.9%(3/352例)为18G719X/20S768I和21L858R/20S768I双突变。原位腺癌、微浸润性腺癌、浸润性非黏液性腺癌、浸润性黏液腺癌患者的EGFR突变率分别为31.0%(40/129)、42.0%(208/495)、58.4%(104/178)、0(0/15)。23.1%(3/13例)同一患者不同病灶EGFR突变检测结果不同(13例先后发生肺腺癌2灶,其中2例首次术后病灶为19Del突变阳性,第2次手术病灶示EGFR野生型;1例首次术后病灶为EGFR野生型,第2次病灶显示21L858R突变型)。EGFR位点突变率与组织学类型、年龄相关,>60岁年龄者及浸润性非黏液性腺癌者突变率高,而与性别、吸烟无关。1.9%(22/1168例)ALK基因重排阳性,浸润性非黏液性腺癌(5.2%)及≤60岁年龄组2.6%)患者中阳性率高,含实性成分的腺癌ALK重排阳性率(22.2%,4/18)明显高于浸润性非黏液腺癌的阳性率(5.2%,12/233)和不含实性成分的腺癌(1.1%,12/1095)(P<0.05),且与性别、吸烟无关。0.8%(6/795例)的患者ROS1基因重排阳性,阳性率与性别、年龄、吸烟、组织学类型无关。382例患者同时检测EGFR、ALK、ROS1,其中40.6%(155/382)的肿瘤含此三者中一种突变或基因重排,未发现其中两者或三者共存现象。结论:本次单中心研究显示,病灶最大径≤1 cm的肺腺癌中,微浸润腺癌占多数(63.1%);至少40%存在EGFR、ALK、ROS1三者之一基因突变或重排改变,三者均与性别、吸烟无关。EGFR突变以21L858R和19Del最常见,在>60岁的患者及浸润性非黏液性腺癌患者中发生率高。ALK重排阳性率在60岁以下的患者及含实性成分的腺癌中高。最大径≤1 cm肺脉癌病灶中ROS1重排阳性率低。同一患者不同病灶间的分子检测结果可存在差异,对于多发病灶有必要分别进行多分子检测。
中图分类号:
朱霞, 王昕, 金晶晶, 肖立. 1 232例病灶最大径≤1 cm肺腺癌EGFR、ALK、ROS1基因状态及临床病理特征的回顾分析研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(01): 57-66.
ZHU Xia, WANG Xin, JIN Jingjing, XIAO Li. Analysis of relationship between gene status (EGFR, ALK, ROS1)and clinicopathological features in 1 232 cases of lung adenocarcinoma with lesion of maximum diameter≤1 cm[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2024, 23(01): 57-66.
表1
352例 EGFR突变阳性患者突变类型及临床病理特征
| Clinical characteristics | L858R | 19Del | 20Ins | G719X | L861Q | S768I | G719X/S768I | L858R/S768I | 总计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases (%) | 165(46.9) | 143(40.6) | 20(5.7) | 14(4.0) | 6(1.7) | 1(0.3) | 2(0.6) | 1(0.3) | 352 |
| Sex | |||||||||
| M | 51 | 44 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 106 |
| F | 114 | 99 | 16 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 246 |
| Age/year | |||||||||
| ≤60 | 79 | 97 | 15 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 207 |
| >60 | 86 | 46 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 145 |
| Smoke | |||||||||
| Yes | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| No | 160 | 138 | 18 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 339 |
| Histologic type | |||||||||
| AIS | 11 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| MIA | 102 | 76 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 208 |
| INMA | 52 | 44 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 104 |
| IMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
表2
817例行EGFR基因检测且病灶≤1 cm肺腺癌临床病理特征
| Clinical characteristics | Mutant type |
Wild type | Mutation rate | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases | 352 | 465 | 43.1% | |
| Sex | ||||
| M | 106 | 155 | 40.6% (106/261) | 0.328 |
| F | 246 | 310 | 44.2% (246/556) | |
| Age/year | ||||
| ≤60 | 207 | 337 | 38.1% (207/544) | 0.001 |
| >60 | 145 | 128 | 53.1% (145/273) | |
| Smoke | ||||
| Yes | 13 | 17 | 43.3% (13/30) | 0.978 |
| No | 339 | 448 | 43.1% (339/787) | |
| Histologic type | ||||
| AIS | 40 | 89 | 31.0% (40/129) | 0.001 |
| MIA | 208 | 287 | 42.0% (208/495) | |
| INMA | 104 | 74 | 58.4% (104/178) | |
| IMA | 0 | 15 | 0 (0/15) |
表4
1 168例行ALK重排检测且病灶大小≤1 cm肺腺癌患者的临床病理特征
| Clinical characteristics | Positive | Negative | Positive rate | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases | 22 | 1146 | 1.9% | |
| Sex | ||||
| M | 3 | 368 | 0.8% (3/371) | 0.065 |
| F | 19 | 778 | 2.4% (19/797) | |
| Age/year | ||||
| ≤60 | 20 | 735 | 2.6% (20/755) | 0.009 |
| >60 | 2 | 411 | 0.5% (2/413) | |
| Smoke | ||||
| Yes | 0 | 43 | 0(0/43) | 1.000 |
| No | 22 | 1103 | 2.0% (2/1125) | |
| Histologic type | ||||
| AIS | 1 | 169 | 0.6% (1/170) | 0.003 |
| MIA | 9 | 733 | 1.2% (9/742) | |
| INMA | 12 | 221 | 5.2% (12/233) | |
| IMA | 0 | 23 | 0 (0/23) |
表6
795例病灶≤1 cm肺腺癌ROS1重排检测患者临床病理特征
| Clinical characteristics | Positive | Negative | Positive rate | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases | 6 | 789 | 0.8% (6/795) | |
| Sex | ||||
| M | 1 | 252 | 0.4% (1/253) | 0.671 |
| F | 5 | 537 | 0.9% (5/542) | |
| Age/year | ||||
| ≤60 | 4 | 495 | 0.8% (4/499) | 1.000 |
| >60 | 2 | 294 | 0.7% (2/296) | |
| Smoke | ||||
| Yes | 0 | 27 | 0 (0/27) | 1.000 |
| No | 6 | 762 | 0.8% (6/768) | |
| Histologic type | ||||
| AIS | 1 | 95 | 1.0% (1/96) | 0.279 |
| MIA | 1 | 520 | 0 (0/521) | |
| INMA | 3 | 158 | 2.5% (4/161) | |
| IMA | 1 | 16 | 5.9% (1/17) |
表7
6例ROS1基因重排阳性病例临床病理特征总结
| Case | Sex | Age/year | Maximum diameter | Pathological diagnosis and morphological characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 55 | 0.5cm | AIS |
| 2 | F | 55 | 0.5cm | IMA with micropapillary and ethmoid structures |
| 3 | F | 67 | 0.6cm | INMA (Acinar predominant adenocarcinoma, Acinar type accounted for 80%, papillary type 10% and micropapillary type 10%) |
| 4 | M | 58 | 1cm | INMA (Acinar primary adenocarcinoma, visible papillary structure ) |
| 5 | F | 59 | 1cm | INMA, (Acinar primary adenocarcinoma, micropapillary, air cavity spread) |
| 6 | F | 62 | 1cm | INMA (acinar type 50%, micropapillary type 50%, visible air cavity spread) |
表8
同一患者2次手术切除标本分子检测结果不同的病例的临床病理特征
| Case | Sex | Age | Smoke | The first molecular detection | Histologic type/maximum diameter |
The second molecular detection |
Histologic type/maximum diameter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① | M | 43 | No | EGFR19Del | INMA/1.2 cm | EGFR- | MIA/0.6 cm |
| ALK- | ALK- | ||||||
| ROS1- | ROS1- | ||||||
| ② | F | 49 | No | EGFR19Del | MIA/0.6 cm | EGFR- | MIA/0.5 cm |
| ALK- | |||||||
| ROS1- | |||||||
| ③ | M | 76 | No | EGFR- | INMA/3 cm | 21L858R | INMA/0.8 cm |
| ALK- | ALK- |
| [1] | SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(3):209-249. |
| [2] | CAO W, CHEN H D, YU Y W, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2021,134(7):783-791. |
| [3] | 王泽洲, 郑莹. 1990年至2020年间全球及我国肺癌的发病流行趋势及防控措施[J].诊断学理论与实践,2023,22(01): 1-7. doi:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2023.01.001 |
| WANG Z Z, ZHENG Y. Lung cancer worldwide and in China from 1990 to 2020: prevalence and prevention measures[J].Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice,2023,22(01):1-7. | |
| [4] | ZHUANG X, ZHAO C, LI J, et al. Clinical features and therapeutic options in non-small cell lung cancer patients with concomitant mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS or BRAF[J].Cancer Med,2019,8(6):2858-2866. |
| [5] | DU X, SHAO Y, QIN H F, et al. ALK-rearrangement in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J].Thorac Cancer,2018,9(4):423-430. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12613pmid:29488330 |
| [6] | LIN J J, SHAW A T. Recent Advances in Targeting ROS1 in Lung Cancer[J].J Thorac Oncol,2017,12(11):1611-1625. doi:S1556-0864(17)30668-8pmid:28818606 |
| [7] | CHAPMAN A M, SUN K Y, RUESTOW P, et al. Lung cancer mutation profile of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS: Meta-analysis and comparison of never and ever smokers[J].Lung Cancer,2016,102:122-134. |
| [8] | ARTEAGA C L, ENGELMAN J A. ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics[J].Cancer Cell,2014,25(3):282-303. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.025pmid:24651011 |
| [9] | DEARDEN S, STEVENS J, WU Y L, et al. Mutation incidence and coincidence in non small-cell lung cancer: meta-analyses by ethnicity and histology (mutMap)[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24(9):2371-2376. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt205pmid:23723294 |
| [10] | SHI Y, LI J, ZHANG S, et al. Molecular epidemiology of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology - mainland China subset analysis of the PIONEER study[J].PLoS One,2015,10(11):e0143515. |
| [11] | TSAO A S, SCAGLIOTTI G V, BUNN P A, et al. Scientific advances in lung cancer 2015[J].Journal of Thoracic Oncology,2016,11(5):613-638. doi:S1556-0864(16)30022-3pmid:27013409 |
| [12] | 贺佳子, 黄清洁, 李莉, 等. 396例非小细胞肺癌EGFR,KRAS,ALK和BRAF基因突变状态及其临床病理特征[J].临床与病理杂志,2020,40(09):2252-2258. |
| HE J Z, HUANG Q J, LI L, et al. Mutation status of EGFR, KRAS, ALK and BRAF genes and their clinicopathological characteristics in 396 patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Pathol Res,2020,40(09):2252-2258. | |
| [13] | 眭玉霞, 邓晓宇, 伍铮, 等. 非小细胞肺癌驱动基因突变与临床病理特征的关系[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2020,36(09):1023-1028. |
| SUI Y X, DENG X Y, WU Z, et al. Comprehensive investigation of driver gene expression and clinicopathological characteristics in non-small cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Pathol Res,2020,36(09):1023-1028. | |
| [14] | STEWART E L, TAN S Z, LIU G, et al. Known and putative mechanisms of resistance to EGFR targeted therapies in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations-a review[J].Transl Lung Cancer Res,2015,4(1):67-81. |
| [15] | KOBAYASHI S, CANEPA H M, BAILEY A S, et al. Compound EGFR mutations and response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors[J].J Thorac Oncol,2013,8(1):45-51. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182781e35pmid:23242437 |
| [16] | DUYSTER J, BAI R Y, MORRIS S W. Translocations involving anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)[J].Oncogene,2001,20(40):5623-5637. pmid:11607814 |
| [17] | MOTEGI A, FUJIMOTO J, KOTANI M, et al. ALK receptor tyrosine kinase promotes cell growth and neurite outgrowth[J].J Cell Sci,2004,117(Pt 15):3319-3329. pmid:15226403 |
| [18] | IWAHARA T, FUJIMOTO J, WEN D, et al. Molecular characterization of ALK, a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed specifically in the nervous system[J].Oncogene,1997,14(4):439-449. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1200849pmid:9053841 |
| [19] | DEVARAKONDA S, MORGENSZTERN D, GOVINDAN R. Genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma[J].Lancet Oncol,2015,16(7):e342-351. |
| [20] | SHAW A T, ENGELMAN J A. ALK in lung cancer: past, present, and future[J].J Clin Oncol,2013,31(8):1105-1111. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.44.5353pmid:23401436 |
| [21] | ACQUAVIVA J, WONG R, CHAREST A. The multifa-ceted roles of the receptor tyrosine kinase ROS in development and cancer[J].Biochim Biophys Acta,2009,1795(1):37-52. |
| [22] | RIKOVA K, GUO A, ZENG Q, et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer[J].Cell,2007,131(6):1190-1203. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.025pmid:18083107 |
| [23] | STRANSKY N, CERAMI E, SCHALM S, et al. The landscape of kinase fusions in cancer[J].Nat Commun,2014,5:4846. |
| [24] | Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma[J].Nature,2014,511(7511):543-550. |
| [25] | BERGETHON K, SHAW A T, OU S H, et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers[J].J Clin Oncol,2012,30(8):863-870. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6345pmid:22215748 |
| [26] | TAKEUCHI K, SODA M, TOGASHI Y, et al. RET,ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer[J].Nat Med,2012,18(3):378-381. |
| [27] | VANSTEENKISTE J, CRINO L, DOOMS C, et al. 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer: early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer consensus on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J].Ann Oncol,2014,25(8):1462-1474. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu089pmid:24562446 |
| [28] | HIRSCH F R, SCAGLIOTTI G V, MULSHINE J L, et al. Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments[J].Lancet,2017,389(10066):299-311. doi:S0140-6736(16)30958-8pmid:27574741 |
| [1] | 肖辅国, 潘自来.浸润前病变的CT值变化在鉴别肺纯磨玻璃结节性质的价值探讨[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 521-525. |
| [2] | 曹琪琪, 杨文洁, 严福华, 刘燕.血管集束征在肺磨玻璃结节定性诊断中的价值研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(05): 521-525. |
| [3] | 杜海磊, 车嘉铭, 朱良纲, 李鹤成, 杭钧彪.病理T1期浸润性肺腺癌不同病理亚型的临床特征及其预后分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(01): 82-86. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
| 全文 |
|
|||||
| 摘要 |
|
|||||