New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis

Abstract

Abstract:

Arran Stibbe defines the term “ecolinguistics” as “the study of the role of language in the life-sustaining interactions of humans with other species and the physical environment” in the monograph of second edition entitledEcolinguistics(Stibbe 2021). Previous studies inclined to “influencing how humans treat ecosystems”, however, it has been changed into “seeing language as part of ecosystems” under the guidance of new thought. Starting from Stibbe’s recent thought, this study reviews ecolinguistics studies and the general framework of discourse analysis, focusing on implications for ecological discourse analysis in China. The results show that our ecological discourse analysis should concentrate on three aspects: (1) exploring the ecological value of our traditional culture, (2) refining the types of ecological discourse, and (3) improving the level of ecological literacy. This is of great significance in terms of further developments of ecolinguistics studies in China.

Key words:ecolinguistics ecological discourse,analysis,analytical,framework

CLC Number:

H0-6

HA Changchen, HUANG Guowen. New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 88-96.

References21

[1]	Alexander, R. & A. Stibbe. 2014. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J].Language Sciences41:104-110. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011 URL
[2]	Fairclough, N. 1995.Critical Discourse Analysis:The Critical Study of Language[M]. London and New York: Longman.
[3]	Huang, G. W. & R. H. Zhao. 2021. Harmonious discourse analysis: Approaching people’s problems in a Chinese context[J].Language Sciences85: 1-18.
[4]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2006. Systemic functional linguistics-applicability: Areas of research[R]. Keynote Speech Delivered at the First Symposium on Functional Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, Dec. 10-12, 2006. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University.
[5]	Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & M. A. K. Halliday. 2009.Systemic Functional Grammar:A First Step into the Theory[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
[6]	Stibbe, A. 2015.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M]. London: Routledge.
[7]	Stibbe, A. 2021.Ecolinguistics:Language,Ecology and the Stories We Live By(2nd edn.)[M]. London: Routledge.
[8]	黄国文. 2006. 翻译研究的语言学探索:古诗词英译本的语言学分析[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[9]	黄国文. 2016a. 生态语言学的兴起与发展[J]. 中国外语(1): 1,9-12.
[10]	黄国文. 2016b. 外语教学与研究的生态化取向[J]. 中国外语(5): 1,9-13.
[11]	黄国文. 2017. 论生态话语和行为分析的假定和原则[J]. 外语教学与研究(6):880-889.
[12]	黄国文. 2018. 导读:生态语言学与生态话语分析[J]. 外国语言文学 (5):449-459.
[13]	黄国文、陈旸. 2018. 生态话语分类的不确定性[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报(1):3-14.
[14]	黄国文、哈长辰. 2021. 生态素养与生态语言学的关系[J]. 外语教学(1):15-19.
[15]	黄国文、李文蓓. 2021. 作为应用语言学的生态语言学[J]. 现代外语(5):592-601.
[16]	黄国文、赵蕊华. 2019. 什么是生态语言学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[17]	李继宗、袁闯. 1988. 论当代科学的生态学化[J]. 学术月刊(7):45-51.
[18]	蒙培元. 2004. 人与自然——中国哲学生态观[M]. 北京: 人民出版社.
[19]	余谋昌. 2018. 生态哲学是生态文明建设的理论基础[J]. 鄱阳湖学刊(2):5-13.
[20]	余谋昌、雷毅、杨通进. 2019. 环境伦理学(第二版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[21]	赵蕊华、黄国文. 2021. 和谐话语分析框架及其应用[J]. 外语教学与研究(1):42-53.