
Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies››2022,Vol. 22››Issue (1): 141-152.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.01.012
Previous ArticlesNext Articles
PENG Zhuo(
), AN Xiaocan(
), MA Liwei(
)
Online:2022-02-28Published:2022-01-27CLC Number:
PENG Zhuo, AN Xiaocan, MA Liwei. An Epistemic Inquiry of Teacher Identity Construction through Content-questions in College English Teaching[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(1): 141-152.
| [1] | Donaghue H. 2018. Relational work and identity negotiation in critical post observation teacher feedback[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 135(8):101-116. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.002URL |
| [2] | Dyer, J.& D. Keller-Cohen. 2000. The discursive construction of professional self through narratives of personal experience[J]. Discourse Studies 2(3):283-304. doi:10.1177/1461445600002003002URL |
| [3] | Hayano K. 2013. Question design in conversation[A]. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (eds.).The Handbook of Conversation Analysis[C]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 395-414. |
| [4] | Heritage J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge[J]. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1):1-29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684URL |
| [5] | Heritage J. 2018. The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘Epistemics of Epistemics’ Group[J]. Discourse Studies 20(1):14-56. doi:10.1177/1461445617734342URL |
| [6] | Heritage J.& G. Raymond. 2012. Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions[A]. In J. P. de Ruiter (ed.). Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 179-192. |
| [7] | Jefferson G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction[A]. In G. H. Lerner (ed.).Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation [C]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 13-31. |
| [8] | Juzwik, M. M.& D. Ives. 2010. Small stories as resources for performing teacher identity: Identity-in-interaction in an urban language arts classroom[J]. Narrative Inquiry 20(1):37-61. doi:10.1075/niURL |
| [9] | Michalovich, A.& H. Netz. 2018. Tag-naxon? (Tag-Right?) in instructional talk: Opening or blocking learning opportunities[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 137(11):57-75. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.006URL |
| [10] | Raymond, G.& J. Heritage. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren[J]. Language in Society 35(5):677-705. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060325URL |
| [11] | Richards K. 2006. ‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation[J]. Applied Linguistics 27(1):51-77. doi:10.1093/applin/ami041URL |
| [12] | Sacks H., E. A. Schegloff& G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation[J]. Language 50(4):696-735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010URL |
| [13] | Schegloff E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis Volume 1[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [14] | 陈新仁. 2014. 语用学视角下的身份研究——关键问题与主要路径[J]. 现代外语 (5):702-710. |
| [15] | 郭奕彤、 江颖. 2020. 英语教师语用身份的话语构建:一项个案研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿 (1):68-76. |
| [16] | 兰良平、 韩刚. 2013. 教师身份构建——课堂提问遭遇沉默的会话分析[J]. 外语界 (2):59-68. |
| [17] | 彭卓. 2020. 知识论视角下婚姻问题热线异议中的知识站位维护[J]. 外语与外语教学 (3):92-106. |
| [18] | 孙咏梅. 2013. 研究生导师组集体身份的话语建构研究——以导师组“我们”的使用为例[J]. 外语与外语教学 (6):11-14. |
| [19] | 田笑、 黄金声. 2015. 建构观下课堂会话身份研究——从Zimmerman会话身份理论到对外汉语示范课堂[J]. 华文教学与研究 (4):66-76. |
| [20] | 徐敏、 陈新仁. 2015. 课堂语境下大学英语教师的身份建构及顺应性[J]. 外语教学 (3):50-54. |
| [21] | 于国栋、 吴亚欣. 2019. 知识论视角下的“提问”[J]. 外语教学理论与实践 (1):39-47. |
| [22] | 袁舒雯、 邵光华、 魏春梅. 2013. 教师课堂身份显现的现象学反思[J]. 教师教育研究 (5):62-66. |
| [1] | ZHAN Shuangjuan.The Development of Ideological and Political Education of College English Curriculum: Advantages, Missions and Approaches[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(6): 68-75. |
| [2] | QUAN Lihong, MA Jinlong.Two Question Formats in Mandarin Chinese Conversation: An Epistemic Approach[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 58-69. |
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |
|
|||||
| Abstract |
|
|||||